Quality Headlines
- OSHPD, Associations, Insurers Report on CA Hospital Readmission Rates
- Blue Shield, CHW and Hill Physicians succeeding with ACO
- New Technology Cuts Cardiac Treatment Time at Sequoia
- Local Medical Association Updates Physicians on EHR Adoption
- Stanford Recruits Renowned Healthcare Leader to Run New Research Center
| Local Medical Association Updates Physicians on EHR Adoption | | Print | |
|
June 8, 2010
This month the federally-designated Oakland-based nonprofit that received $17.3 million in federal money to support doctors’ implementation of electronic health records technology (EHR) plans to begin enrolling doctors for services to help them buy and install EHR systems. The California Health Information Partnership & Services Organization (CalHIPSO) will also begin offering EHR technology packages to doctors at a discount in the next couple of months. The California Medical Association plans to offer 9 to 10 EHR systems at a cost savings as well, ones that meet the U.S. Health and Human Services standards, said Donald Waters, Executive Director of the Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Association. Waters informally represents California’s medical associations in his role as a member of CalHIPSO's board. Medical associations will play an important role in educating doctors about the federal incentives for EHR adoption and how to qualify as well as the long-term disincentives for not adopting them. “Doctors may not be aware of the steps necessary to ensure funding from the federal government,” said William Parrish, CEO of the Santa Clara County Medical Association. Waters recommends that doctors wait a couple of months to see what packages CalHIPSO and CMA come up with before they start making decisions. In the meantime, CalHIPSO is analyzing applications submitted by organizations that are vying for contracts with CalHIPSO to become local extension centers (LECs) to advise doctors. By June 30 CalHIPSO will have selected the organizations it intends to enlist as LECs, said Speranza Avram, Executive Director at CalHIPSO. They will help with determining what type of technology physicians need, helping them select a vendor, providing options for purchasing a system at a discount, and helping them train their staff. But Waters wonders how much consulting CalHIPSO, which covers all of California except Los Angeles and Orange counties, will be able to provide each doctor. The funding pencils out to about $4,176 in subsidies per physician to the LECs, Avram said. “How much consulting can you get for that?” Waters asked. One of the roles of the LECs will be to instruct doctors on what they need to do to achieve “meaningful use.” That’s the term the federal government is using to describe implemented EHR systems that are operating as intended. But that definition has not yet been finalized. Avram said Centers for Medicare & Medicade Services (CMS) indicated those rules would be finalized in June. Organized medicine felt that the definition was very onerous with all the reporting requirements, Waters said. “Based on the comments that CMS has received, there was a great deal of concern about a ‘one size fits all’ approach and a desire to have the rules be more flexible,” Avram said. Doctors will need to comply with that definition of meaningful use in order to qualify for federal incentives of up to $44,000 over five years under the Medicare Program and up to $65,000 under the Medicaid program. Waters acknowledges that even with the incentives, EHR adoption is a huge challenge for physicians. It’s not just the cost of the system it’s the impact on production. “I’ve had doctors say that impact [can last] one to two years. It changes how doctors record and work with information,” he said. “There’s no question it will enhance their ability to practice, they will have information brought to them more quickly,” he said. But the cost savings will vary. “Doctors are frankly a bit leery about making the leap,” he said. And then there’s the whole issue of interoperability, how does EHR A interact with EHR B, Waters asked. “The two of them have to go into a black box and come out the other side in a form the recipient can read,” he said. The technology for dealing with this is still unfolding and at the federal level there are efforts to develop an interoperability platform. The National Health Information Network (NHIN) is a project by the federal government to develop a set of standards, services and policies that will allow the exchange of secure health information over the Internet. The ultimate goal is for health information technology to be exchanged across diverse entities allowing for a patient’s medical information to travel with him or her. To follow the activities of the NHIN Working Group visit it’s website at http://healthit.hhs.gov/policycommittee
|
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 08 June 2010 11:34 |

Comments