Health/Medical
CIRM Awards $25M to Stem Cell Transplantation Research PDF  | Print |  Email

June 29, 2010

The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), the State’s stem cell funding agency created by Proposition 71, has awarded $25 million to 19 projects focused on solving immune rejection of transplanted stem cells. Stanford University, the Universities of California, San Francisco, Berkeley and Davis combined received the majority of the funding, $13.73M. The Palo Alto Institute for Research and Education Inc. was awarded $885,475.

Stem cell transplantation has actually been going on for 50 years in the form of bone marrow transplants, said Jan Nolta Director of the Institute for Regenerative Cures, at the University of California, Davis (UCD) facility in Sacramento. “People don’t realize those are stem cells,” she said. Despite the long history of stem cell transplantation there are still a lot of problems with the practice, Nolta said. In order for the body to accept the stem cells physicians usually have to knock out the patient’s white blood cells and that puts them at risk of infection. Plus the patients have to take immunosuppressive drugs for life to prevent rejection.

UCD received a CIRM grant for $1.3 million for dermatology professor William Murphy’s research to improve the safety and efficacy of stem cell transplantation, which would hopefully help with heart, lung and other solid organ transplants as well as cancer treatments.

Murphy is doing research on what he calls “natural-killer cells” which are injected from a donor to the patient and kill the patient’s immune cells so that there are no immunological attacks on tissues and organs. It allows donor cells to graft in the host’s body without the need of drugs to suppress immune system responses.

In February UCD celebrated the opening of its $63 million Institute for Regenerative Cures. CIRM provided $20 million of that funding. The center includes a Good Manufacturing Practice Facility for Cellular Therapies to process and test stem cell lines for research. It’s one of only two in California, the other is in Los Angeles. And there are less than 10 in the country, Nolta said. Now Stanford and other UC campuses are using the facility to process stem cell lines for their research.

Of the Northern California universities receiving CIRM grant money this time around, Stanford claimed the largest slice, $5.7 million. The University of California, San Francisco got $3.8 million and UC Berkeley received $2 million.

UCD has clinical trials underway applying stem cell therapies to heart attacks and bone repair and hopes to start clinical trials later this year or in 2011 for peripheral vascular disease in diabetics and retinal occlusion, Nolta said.

“In writing proposition 71, we anticipated the need to overcome the immune response in order to fulfill one of the ultimate promises of regenerative medicine, replacing or repairing tissues with stem cells,” said Robert Klein, chair of the CIRM Governing Board,” in a press release.

Nobody knows when we’ll see some of these therapies starting to be used on patients, but already scientists are able to take pieces of a person’s skin and use those cells to grow a portion of a liver.

“I don’t think it will be that far off. It sounds like science fiction, but we understand all the steps,” Nolta said.


Read 0 Comments... >>
Last Updated on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 15:00
 
Clinical Alert to MDs on FDA's Clopidogrel Warning PDF  | Print |  Email

June 29, 2010

On June 28 the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) issued a clinical alert to physicians regarding the new FDA warning about patient response to the anti-platelet drug clopidogrel (Plavix).

The FDA requires a new warning on the box of clopidogrel products stating that, based on genetic make-up, some patients can’t metabolize the drug into its active form and won’t respond to the drug. The FDA estimates that between 2 percent and 4 percent of patients won’t be able to metabolize the drug. But there is not yet enough information available for developing recommendations on genetic testing of patients, the ACCF and AHA stated in their report.

“What do you do with that FDA warning?” asked Rita Redberg M.D., a professor of medicine in the cardiology division at the University of California San Francisco.

“The specific impact of genetic differences on clinical outcome is really not known. Genetics is not at a point where we can make clinical recommendations based on genetics,” Redberg said.

There are also questions about how genetic testing should be used and if the cost of that would be reimbursed.

Redberg said doctors were really confused by the FDA warning and were wondering if they should be ordering these genetic tests. But they can be expensive and take a while to process and they don’t all fall under FDA supervision, she said.

“It’s very unclear how reliable that information is and what you do with that information once you get it,” Redberg said.

Some alternative drugs seem to have less dependence on genetic factors, but they may cause more bleeding and cost more, the report states. One alternative was recently found to have a significantly higher rate of solid tumors.

Redberg feels the ACCF/AHA report helped ease doctors’ confusion by essentially recommending that they keep doing what they are currently doing.

Some of the recommendations the ACCF/AHA report does make are that genetic testing might be done if a patient is at moderate or high risk of a poor outcome. And in patients who have been taking clopidogrel as prescribed, yet had problems due to the drug not working or working too well and causing bleeding, the report states that might warrant genetic testing, switching to another drug or adjusting the clopidogrel dose.


Read 0 Comments... >>
Last Updated on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 14:55
 
Senior Health Plan May Extend to Rural Regions PDF  | Print |  Email

June 25, 2010

Local and national elder care leaders convened at a conference in Sacramento this week, the culmination of a yearlong project to explore the expansion of an all-inclusive healthcare program for seniors in rural California counties.

The Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), a national, federally funded program, has 20 centers in urban areas of California but none in rural regions. Now senior service organizations in Humboldt, San Joaquin and Riverside counties are working with their communities to determine the feasibility of opening PACE centers.

“It’s to keep frail seniors away from nursing homes, to keep them in their own homes as long as possible,” said Robert Edmondson, CEO of On Lok Inc., which hosted the conference, “Making PACE a Reality in Rural California.”

The SCAN Foundation of Long Beach made a $100,000 grant to On Lok Inc., a San Francisco-based  nonprofit organization, that forged the way for the (PACE) program to develop more than 25 years ago. The grant was for On Lok to identify three rural counties that could research the feasibility of having a PACE center in their region. On Lok is focusing on Humboldt, San Joaquin and Riverside counties. Currently there are 71 PACE organizations in 31 states, California has 20 of those, run by five organizations, but PACE has yet to be expanded to any rural counties.

“Our goal is to make certain that every senior in the sate has access to a PACE program,” Edmondson said. On Lok operates 10 PACE programs in San Francisco, Fremont and San Jose and will open another one in Fremont at the end of 2011.

PACE programs are funded through Medicare and Medicaid and in California they are also licensed through the California Department of Healthcare Services, Division on Long-Term Care.

PACE is a center-based managed care program that serves people 55 or older who have been determined by the state to be nursing-home-eligible. Most of them qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid. PACE has centers that members can visit from one to five days a week. Transportation is provided and PACE members get all of their health needs taken care of there including doctors, dentist and physical therapy appointments. PACE centers also provide meals, recreational activities, laundry and facilities for bathing members.

In Humboldt County the Humboldt Senior Resource Center is the lead agency coordinating with On Lok to research the costs, number of members they’d need, which community services would need to be involved and the barriers to forming a PACE center in Humboldt County.

Because rural counties have much less dense populations state regulators may need to be flexible on some regulations to make this feasible, said Joyce Hayes, Executive Director of the Humboldt Senior Resource Center.

“We may need to ask for some waivers in terms of staffing structure or transportation requirements and we may need some financial support for the first few years,” Hayes said. The Humboldt Center does not currently offer medical services and Hayes said PACE seems like a great program to explore.

“It’s shown to be a very high quality program that saves dollars and provides high quality care to elders, she said. Although some PACE centers around the country are run by for profit companies, in California all PACE centers must be operated by nonprofits.

On Lok is wrapping up this year-long project funded by the SCAN Foundation and the partnership in Riverside County, headed by the Riverside County Office on Aging, which On Lok has been working with, has notified the state that it will apply for the PACE program, said Gretchen Brickson, Director of Technical Assistance for On Lok.

 

 


Read 0 Comments... >>
Last Updated on Friday, 25 June 2010 15:55
 
New FDA Website Reports Adverse Reactions to Drugs PDF  | Print |  Email

June 18, 2010

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has launched a new website with information for patients and healthcare providers on the safety of drugs and biologics that have recently been approved.

The website stems from the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) which was passed in 2007. It authorizes FDA to improve its system of assessing and summarizing the safety of drugs and other products that have been recently approved. It also allows the agency to convey to the public its safety monitoring measures.

FDAAA requires FDA to produce full safety summaries of drugs or biologics that received approval either 18 months after approval or after the drug or biologic has been used to treat 10,000 patients, whichever happens later. The new law does not apply to drugs approved before 2007.

“Frankly there have been no surprises among the 26 drugs and biologics studied for the first posting,” said Karen Riley, an FDA spokeswoman. “The law applies to new molecular entities, products with an active ingredient not previously marketed, original biologic products and certain non NMEs, drugs whose active ingredient has been previously approved but is now being marketed as a new formulation, new dosing regimen or in combination (with another drug), or for a new or expanded patient population,” Riley said.

After a drug is approved by the FDA, some adverse effects that did not appear in the clinical trials may be observed in patients because the number of people getting the drug is then much larger and more diverse than the limited number of patients receiving it in the clinical trials.

FDA tracks those new adverse effects that appear after approval by mandating pharmaceutical and biologic companies to file reports and also through reports filed with FDA by healthcare professionals and patients through the FDA’s MedWatch reporting program. In addition, FDA collects information on adverse effects from medical literature and drug studies that continue even after FDA approval of a drug.


Read 0 Comments... >>
Last Updated on Friday, 18 June 2010 09:28
 
Telehealth to Launch in 50-100 CA Medical Facilities This Summer PDF  | Print |  Email

June 11, 2010

By early July the California Telehealth Network (CTN) plans to announce the names of 50 to 100 of the 863 hospitals, clinics and medical facilities approved to get telehealth services as part of a federal pilot project, said CTN’s new Executive Director, Eric Brown.

“The goal is through the wonders of broadband to bring access to quality healthcare to communities which don’t have it. It’s an amazing transformation,” said Brown, who is based in the Univeristy of California, Davis Medical Center campus in Sacramento. The University of California Office of the President and the UC Davis Health System are leading the CTN consortium.

This technology will allow patients in rural or medically underserved areas to get medical expertise from any other participating medical facility in the state. Brown gives a scenario of a child who is involved in a car accident in Red Bluff and physicians are trying to decide if he should be transported to a trauma center by ambulance or MedEvac. Through a telemedicine conferencing session specialists elsewhere in the state can see the patient and monitor his vitals in order to make better decisions based on more comprehensive information.

Retinal scans for diabetics in rural areas is another potential use. But it’s not only rural areas that will be connected. Many residents of urban areas are finding it difficult to get adequate medical care. Of the 863 sites participating in the pilot, 40 percent are in urban areas, Brown said.

Continuing education for physicians will also be offered via the network as well as access to clinical research and possibly access to commercially hosted electronic health records systems.

A partnership of organizations headed by the University of California system formed in 2007 as part of a $22 million pilot project, funded by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC required 15 percent in matching funds and the California Emerging Technology Fund provided $3.6 million, Brown said. Other contributors include UnitedHealth, The California Teleconnect Fund, the National Coalition for Health Integration and the California Healthcare Foundation.

Once funded in January CTN solicited letters of authority from 1,000 medical facilities in rural and medically underserved areas. Of those, the FCC approved 863.

CTN has negotiated a $27 million, three-year contract with AT&T to build a secure telecommunications system tailored for medical use. It is designed to connect hundreds of healthcare providers all over California and will be one of the largest networks for that purpose in the nation, the CTN reported.

CTN is negotiating both good rates and quality of service with AT&T. If a provider were to try and conduct telemedicine over the Internet they may experience delays or signal degradation.

“This system eliminates all that,” Brown said. And the price to providers will be well below market rates, he added. For instance if you want a T1 line, the first three months are free and then it’s $50 monthly. You can’t get a better deal than that, Brown said.

And the rates are the same all over the state. Generally in rural areas there’s a distance charge, but everyone pays the same rate under the CTN contract with AT&T.

Although much of the emphasis of this pilot project is on rural medical providers, the goal is to create a statewide telehealth system connecting a majority of healthcare facilities in California.

“Telehealth and new information technologies can help overcome health disparities by bridging geographic distances, redistributing medical expertise and creating new venues for education,” said Dr. Thomas Nesbitt, associate vice chancellor for strategic technologies and alliances at UC Davis Health System in a press release.


Read 0 Comments... >>
Last Updated on Friday, 11 June 2010 14:56